5.1: Communicating outcomes: Mind-map
- Consider the method (e.g. written, verbal) and the medium (e.g. report, online, presentation).
- Both method and medium will be influenced by the project research and its intended audience.
5.2: Convincing arguments:
- All findings/outcomes should be convincing and presented logically where the assumption is that the audience has little or no knowledge of the project process.
- Developing evaluative conclusions.
5.3: Critical and objective analysis and evaluation:
- Secondary and primary data should be critiqued and considered with an objective mindset.
- Objectivity results in more robust evaluations where an analysis justifies a judgement.
LO3 Present the project and communicate appropriate recommendations based on meaningful conclusions drawn from the evidence findings and/or analysis
- P5 Present findings and data using appropriate tools and techniques.
- P6 Communicate appropriate recommendations as a result of findings and data analysis to draw valid and meaningful conclusions.
- M3 Evaluate the selection of appropriate tools and techniques for accuracy and authenticity to support and justify recommendations.
LO3 and LO4
- D2 Critically evaluate and reflect on the project outcomes, the decisionmaking process and changes or developments of the initial project management plan to support justification of recommendations and learning during the project.
